calculator

By alimak96 on Sep 05, 2012

its a simple calculator code for a bot and you can edit it to use ctcp and answer with echo for personal use

synax : !calc < * or + or - or / >
you can turn it on and off using [ !calc on - !calc off ]
and you can use it in a channel or in a private msg

------------------------
| Code By [ Alimak96 ] |
------------------------

on the channel :
#calc on
on *:TEXT:!cinfo:#: { notice $nick $nick , You Can Use !calc <number> < * or + or - or / > <number> }
on *:TEXT:!calc *:#: {
  if ($2 isnum) && ($4 isnum) && ($3 == +) || ($3 == -) || ($3 == *) || ($3 == /) { msg $chan $2- = $calc($2-) }
  elseif ($2 == on) { .enable #calc }
  elseif ($2 == off) { .disable #calc }
  else { notice $nick , You Can Only Use Numbers And ( +,-,*,/ ) }
}
on private msg :
on *:TEXT:!calc *:?: {
  if ($2 isnum) && ($4 isnum) && ($3 == +) || ($3 == -) || ($3 == *) || ($3 == /) { msg $nick $2- = $calc($2-) }
  else { msg $nick  4 You Can Only Use Numbers And ( +,-,*,/ ) }
}
#calc end

Like Page Follow Author

Comments

alimak96 - Sep 08, 2012

Updated "

before you can just use [ numbet +,-,,/ number ] now you can use [ number +,-,,/ number +,-,*,/ number .... etc ]

Respond

sunslayer - Sep 06, 2012

@alimak96 > added [ ($3 == +) || ($3 == -) || ($3 == ) || ($3 == /) ] in ( if )
if the person didnt use on of these it will send a notice to him
You Can Only Use Numbers And ( +,-,,/ )That's what I was talking about

Respond

Stewie1k94 - Sep 06, 2012

True. ;)

Respond

alimak96 - Sep 06, 2012

@Stewie1k94
@Jethro
while $calc($2 $3 $4)
works fine
idont have to change it :P

but if ppl want to use them they can simply change it

Respond

Stewie1k94 - Sep 06, 2012

And there's that too. :D

Respond

Jethro - Sep 06, 2012

You could do:

$calc($2-4)

this will only match the range between $2 and $4.

Respond

Stewie1k94 - Sep 06, 2012

I still think my suggestion would work better, you could also use this check

if ($2-) {

Respond

Sorasyn - Sep 06, 2012

It is, now. Lol. As for the matching algorithm, you could use regex, but I firmly believe that you should calculate the equation as a whole instead of nit picking it apart. Doing so just makes it's job, and yours harder.

"Don't work harder, work smarter."

Respond

alimak96 - Sep 06, 2012

@Stewie1k94
becauz i think if i use $calc($2-)

this maybe not work :P
if ($2 isnum) && ($4 isnum) && ($3 == +) || ($3 == -) || ($3 == *) || ($3 == /)

Respond

Stewie1k94 - Sep 06, 2012

Why not have

$calc($2-)

instead of

$calc($2 $3 $4)

Respond

wazer - Sep 06, 2012

(15:02:24) (@user) !calc 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001
(15:02:25) (@Bot) 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 = 0

Perhaps you should check for this and the other post i made, should give an nan error or something?

Respond

alimak96 - Sep 06, 2012

updated :
you can use [ !calc on ] and [ !calc off ]
and you can use it on private msg to

@Sorasyn I wouldn't have bothered sharing 4 lines of code
its 16 line

@sunslayer There should be some sort of validation on $3 making sure its an operator
what do you mean ?!

Respond

alimak96 - Sep 06, 2012

updated :
added [ ($3 == +) || ($3 == -) || ($3 == ) || ($3 == /) ] in ( if )
if the person didnt use on of these it will send a notice to him
You Can Only Use Numbers And ( +,-,,/ )

and with
!cinfo
it will notice the person with
nickname , You Can Use !calc < * or + or - or / >

Respond

wazer - Sep 06, 2012

(14:07:54) (@user) !calc 1 / 0
(14:07:54) (@bot) 1 / 0 = 0

gahhhh

Respond

sunslayer - Sep 06, 2012

There should be some sort of validation on $3 making sure its an operator

Respond

Sorasyn - Sep 05, 2012

Sweet. :)

Respond

alimak96 - Sep 05, 2012

@Sorasyn
P.S. You're sporting an opening bracket on line 4, rather than a closing bracket.

updated

Respond

Sorasyn - Sep 05, 2012

Could expand upon it, based on what kind of calculating it was designed for. At its current state, I wouldn't have bothered sharing 4 lines of code, that won't work as-is anyway.

P.S. You're sporting an opening bracket on line 4, rather than a closing bracket.

Respond